Today on the floor of the House of Representatives we are considering the issue of mental health parity. Unfortunately, some of my colleagues have clouded this important issue with extensive and over-burdensome regulations. As a supporter of mental health parity it is regrettable that I can not support the bill at hand. With over 50 million adults suffering from mental disorders it is necessary that there is access to mental health services. The Senate has passed legislation on parity that will allow access to these needed services, and I applaud and support their efforts. As a long time supporter of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act, it is disappointing that this legislation was coupled in with the over regulated mental health parity bill. Congress has taken great strides over the last few years towards adequately protecting an individual's genetic information and encouraging lifesaving genetic testing. Attaching this legislation to the flawed parity bill puts those efforts to shame. Congress should take up the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act on its own and allow those, like myself, to vote in favor of the bill.
Pete Sessions: “Today on the floor of the House of Representatives we are considering the issue of mental health parity. Unfortunately…”
On the recordMarch 5, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing mental health parity and the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act during House debate.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
Sep 24, 2024
I would be hopeful that this would not be a Trump bash hating ordeal, but if the gentleman is going to speak, he ought to speak factually correct.
Sep 3, 2024
We think we have to make it work, and we think in Congress, we have got to work together to make that work.
May 14, 2024
I appreciate the opportunity to speak on the floor about a very important topic but really to honor two people, Jackie and David Siegel of central Florida. Jackie and David Siegel, as proud Americans, have stepped up to form what is known…
Jan 31, 2024
Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 30. ____________________





