I am convinced that physical barriers at our borders--fencing in particular--are an important and central cost-effective solution to border security. My colleague, the Democratic leader, has used a figure of $7 billion. We think that is greatly exaggerated. We believe it can be done for much less than that, although that money has been floated. A private contractor has indicated he could do it for about $1.8 billion, and that is the money we put into the bill. And with the help of the National Guard, I think we ought to be able to build fencing at a rate far less than that. I note that this is a one-time expenditure. This expenditure is going to reduce the 1 million apprehensions a year dramatically. A barrier like this will enhance the ability of each and every single Border Patrol officer to do his or her job. It will enable them to be far more effective. It is going to enable us to not have to hire nearly as many people. It will send a signal to the world that our border is not open.
Pete Sessions: “I am convinced that physical barriers at our borders--fencing in particular--are an important and central cost-effective…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of physical barriers for border security.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
I thank the chairwoman for the time, and I appreciate the gentleman from California standing in support of this bill, H.R. 2622. In fact, this was a bipartisan agreement that we came to. The gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Gottheimer), and…
my baseball coach, Roger Williams, Chair of the House Small Business Committee, headed up yesterday at the Rules Committee.
It would make sense not to rely on self-certification in the future, and yet the Biden Administration is proposing to allow applicants for student loan forgiveness to self-certify for this benefit.
We cannot separate this conspiracy from the Russian-Ukraine War because Trump has no intention to keep aiding Ukraine.





