I rise opposing this Dietary Supplemental and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act. The bill would replace the current system of adverse event reporting by medical professionals through the MedWatch Program with a mandatory system that would require manufacturers and retailers to keep records and to report to the FDA when they received reports of adverse events. The bill redirects complaints of adverse effects away from local health responders, health care professionals, to manufacturers and retailers and then to the FDA. Consumers who are injured should be directed to medical professionals trained to determine whether the condition is caused by ingredients in the supplement or by other factors, not by self-diagnosis. Secondly, this bill depends on those who may be responsible for types of drugs or drug supplements to report adverse effects to the FDA. Those guilty of violating the law are less likely to report adverse effects to the government and to follow the law. I think this is a bad bill. I hope that we reject it.
Pete Sessions: “I rise opposing this Dietary Supplemental and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act. The bill would replace the…”
On the recordDecember 8, 2006
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing the Dietary Supplemental and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act during House floor debate.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
May 6, 2024
I thank the distinguished gentleman and friend from Kansas for yielding. I also thank my colleague from the District of Columbia, representing the minority or the Democratic Party on the Subcommittee on Government Operations and the…
Oct 24, 2023
I think that the protection of the innocents is always paramount, and I think that a humanitarian corridor must be established for those to leave so that they are not going to be subjected to conflict.
Sep 18, 2023
It is very apparent to me that competition is one of those factors that is not part of your equation for the marketplace.





