several people who opposed the nomination of Theodore B. Olson to be Solicitor General made charges that contained serious factual errors. These are not, I believe, debatable questions of interpretation when the facts are carefully examined. We have had our bipartisan investigation and hearing, and we have confirmed Mr. Olson, and we should move on; but we owe it to Mr. Olson, to future nominees, and to the Senate as an institution to make sure that the record is correct. Before turning to some specific errors, I want to emphasize that Mr. Olson responded to all of the committee's questions. Mr. Olson is one of the Nation's most talented lawyers and most dedicated public servants. He completed our questionnaire; he answered the questions asked at the hearing; he responded to more than one hundred written follow-up questions; and he repeatedly offered to meet with any Senator who had any further questions. He was clear, he was candid, he was responsive.
Pete Sessions: “several people who opposed the nomination of Theodore B. Olson to be Solicitor General made charges that contained…”
Editor's note · Context
Defending Theodore B. Olson's nomination to be Solicitor General against factual errors raised by opponents.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
I thank the gentlewoman not only for taking the time to initiate this important discussion about our former colleague, the gentlewoman, Eddie Bernice Johnson, but also thank her for gathering together what I think is evidence of a solid…
I want to make sure we get closer on this understanding about CDBG money and the things that would flow.
It is also President Biden who finds himself at the vise grip of employees who decide that they do not like his policies related to Gaza.
I would be hopeful that this would not be a Trump bash hating ordeal, but if the gentleman is going to speak, he ought to speak factually correct.





