I believe his deficiencies for the position revolve around an honestly held political philosophy that I do not agree with--judicial activism. That is the main basis for opposing his nomination. But I am very troubled by the case I cited because I do not understand how it could have been disposed of in the way it was. I believe the judge should have blown the whistle on this with a proper plea bargain. It was not done. I would like to have him have an opportunity to explain why.
Pete Sessions: “I believe his deficiencies for the position revolve around an honestly held political philosophy that I do not agree…”
On the recordMarch 9, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over Judge Paez's nomination and the implications of judicial activism.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
Mar 28, 2023
The purpose of this hearing is to begin this face-to-face investigation by the IG.
Oct 24, 2023
I think that the protection of the innocents is always paramount, and I think that a humanitarian corridor must be established for those to leave so that they are not going to be subjected to conflict.
Mar 20, 2024
I cannot agree with is the way we have a political philosophy by the Democratic Party that we are going to open up completely our borders without regard for national security, without regard for the law, without regard for common sense…





