I will close with one more point. A number of years ago, I understood this when the Republicans did what I considered a budget gimmick of several billion dollars. I began to count up how that added up. This year this budget has about $18 billion in spending over the President's budget, 2 billion of which is a gimmick. I believe it is going to amount to advance funding and will be spent. I believe, without dispute, it is $18 billion over the President's budget. Somebody might say: This is a large economy. What is $18 billion? That is what I used to hear. I made up a chart that I call 'Every Billion Counts.' A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon it is real money. Look at this chart. They say: Well, we only jumped the President by $18 billion. This is in the discretionary accounts. This is the discretionary budget. They jump it just $18 billion in 2008. But what happens to that $18 billion? It goes into the baseline of our Government spending. It goes into the baseline of our Government spending. So next year, if you try to remove that $18 billion, you know what they will say. They will descend on us in the halls, they will descend on us in this body and say: You are slashing the budget. You are cutting the budget. You can never cut the budget. So it goes into the baseline. Let's say we just continue at that rate. Let's say next year, they just do another $18 billion.…
Pete Sessions: “I will close with one more point. A number of years ago, I understood this when the Republicans did what I considered a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budgetary practices and the implications of increased spending in government budgets.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
I appreciate the gentlewoman coming forth, as she does represent the District of Columbia, but I think in the argument it is important to note that these are not just local judges that we are talking about. They don't handle any matter…
We think we have to make it work, and we think in Congress, we have got to work together to make that work.
You are the head of this organization, and you have proposed taking to 11 parts per billion.
I thank the gentleman, Brother Weber, for you bringing tonight this conversation that Members of Congress on a bipartisan basis can have about the gentleman from Texas, Michael Burgess. I am one of a few Members that remember well when he…





