On the recordJanuary 2, 2013
My concern, which I have expressed in my conference, is I don't like the idea that we codify in the rules explicit supersenatorial power to a chairman and a ranking member of a committee, and we have almost no recognition in our rules of the majority leader. This is a tradition; this is a way we operate. Each one of us is 1 of 100. We are equal in our responsibilities and in our ultimate voting power if we don't allow it to be eroded. As I understand the rule, there would be four amendments, you know, guaranteed up front by leaders. Think about that, as I know you will be active, both of you, in the discussion of how to write these compromises, and I am hopeful we will reach one. But I wouldn't, in a nonpartisan comment--I am not sure we ought to further embed in our rules superpowers to one Senator or another group of Senators. Has the Senator thought about that? I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Rhode Island.
Source
govinfo.gov




