We have a problem when two people are working and they are making $30,000 a year--just two, a man and woman. They fall in love. They get married. At $30,000 a year each, they end up paying about $800 more a year, which is $60 or $80 a month in extra tax simply for getting married. I want to eliminate that. If somebody wants to deal with the other problem, they can. Frankly, I am beginning to observe there is a feeling on the other side that this bill needs to go away, that people are not willing to confront it directly. I hope that is not so. I hope we can see this legislation go forward.
Pete Sessions: “We have a problem when two people are working and they are making $30,000 a year--just two, a man and woman. They fall…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the tax implications of marriage during a debate on tax legislation.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
I think that the protection of the innocents is always paramount, and I think that a humanitarian corridor must be established for those to leave so that they are not going to be subjected to conflict.
This is an embarrassment, in my opinion, and I think the opinion of most people where I represent in Texas, that we are encouraging this behavior.
You talk about fairness, you talk about cost-effectiveness, you talk about being pragmatic, you talk about science-based answers.
This past March, the inspector general of the General Services Administration issued a report into the identity verification and validation service Login.gov. Login.gov is managed by the Technology Transformation Service within GSA and was…





