The Senator from Illinois is very eloquent in his advocacy. But I think he is avoiding the question posed by Senator Bunning, who simply says he is prepared tonight to fund the programs that you wish, to have them go forward. As I understand it, is it not true he said that if you take this $10 billion, I think it is, that is required to fund this program, and you fund it out of the $400 billion unspent from the stimulus--a large part of it was supposed to be for this very purpose--that he would let the bill go tonight; that what he objects to is not doing that, and which, in effect, means--does it mean that the debt will be increased again tonight by another $10 billion.
Pete Sessions: “The Senator from Illinois is very eloquent in his advocacy. But I think he is avoiding the question posed by Senator…”
On the recordFebruary 25, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing funding for programs and the implications of using unspent stimulus funds.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
Apr 17, 2023
Mr. Chairman, thank you very much, and I want to thank our witness for being here and the conversation that she is having with the Committee.
Nov 8, 2023
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made…
Jul 9, 2024
You talk about fairness, you talk about cost-effectiveness, you talk about being pragmatic, you talk about science-based answers.
Jun 5, 2023
I view that this Department is failing to protect this country, which is its core mission.





