There would have been private growth and private investment--not an increase in our deficit. But it goes on. In their summary of what the President was going to say, it said he favored a ``tax code that creates American jobs and pays down our debt.'' First of all, is the Senator aware that under the President's plan that he submitted to us--his budget--the lowest single year's deficit in the 10-year window is $488 billion--that we never come close to paying down the debt in the plan he submitted to us? And how can the President--this is an unfair question, but I will ask the Senator from Wyoming--how can the President say he has a plan that pays down our debt when the lowest single deficit he proposes is nearly $500 billion?
Share
More from Pete Sessions
I thank the distinguished gentleman and friend from Kansas for yielding. I also thank my colleague from the District of Columbia, representing the minority or the Democratic Party on the Subcommittee on Government Operations and the…
I appreciate the opportunity to speak on the floor about a very important topic but really to honor two people, Jackie and David Siegel of central Florida. Jackie and David Siegel, as proud Americans, have stepped up to form what is known…
The Federal Government is not at work. The Federal Government is not producing the results that we think would be necessary.
the reason why we get specific about these items on both sides of the aisle is that we find that there is happy-talk conversation between us, and then something different appears





