On the recordMarch 27, 2000
I respect his conclusion, which I believe is legally sound, that most of the campaign proposals which have been proposed in recent years run afoul of the Constitution, according to a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court. That is a fact. I believe that is a good fact. Some would say: Well, you want to limit free speech when you want to stop burning the flag and you want to prohibit that and that is free speech. The Supreme Court, by a 5-4 majority, held that the act of burning a flag is free speech. I don't agree with that. In 1971, the Supreme Court didn't agree with that. For over 200 years they didn't agree with that. Over 40 States have laws against it. When it passed this time recently, it was a 5-4 majority. But in my view, the flag of the United States is a unique object and prohibiting its desecration will not in any way fundamentally alter the free expression of ideas in this country.
Source
govinfo.gov




