I will comment to the distinguished Senator from Nevada about Senator Harkin's passionate advocacy for the disabled in America. He cares deeply about that issue and there is no one more eloquent on it than he is. I ask the Senator from Nevada if he is aware that Jeffrey Sutton voluntarily agreed, on a pro bono basis, to prepare and to passionately argue a case before the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio that a woman who was blind should be admitted to the Case Western University Medical School, even though he lost the case. I wonder if the Senator knew that? A lot of the Senators have not known that he has a personal concern about this issue and has given of his own wealth--that is, his time--toward that effort.
Pete Sessions: “I will comment to the distinguished Senator from Nevada about Senator Harkin's passionate advocacy for the disabled in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing advocacy for the disabled and a specific legal case during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
It is important that the dollars that we give you, however, equally are tracked, known, and understood.
I thank the chairwoman for the time, and I appreciate the gentleman from California standing in support of this bill, H.R. 2622. In fact, this was a bipartisan agreement that we came to. The gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Gottheimer), and…
Congressman Sessions, when we get 10 people in a room, you get 10 different ideas.
It would make sense not to rely on self-certification in the future, and yet the Biden Administration is proposing to allow applicants for student loan forgiveness to self-certify for this benefit.





