Mr. Speaker, this is about a decision that this House is going to make to debate today, IDEA. That is what the vote on the rule is about, are we going to proceed with regular order? I am in favor of what we are doing. I believe that the clay that we have put in front of us today will be a better model. We will rebuild IDEA and we will make it better than what it is today. As the parent of a child who will fall under IDEA, I can tell you obviously there are risks involved any time you get into a new circumstance. I am convinced beyond any reasonable doubt that the opportunity that this great body has to make IDEA better for every single student, for the teachers and the administrators who will work underneath these new processes and the students who come into contact with our children, will find that this will be a better way. We have learned from the last 7 years. We will learn on a going-forward basis. It is the right thing to do.
Pete Sessions: “Mr. Speaker, this is about a decision that this House is going to make to debate today, IDEA. That is what the vote on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of improving the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) during a House debate.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 30. ____________________
It would make sense not to rely on self-certification in the future, and yet the Biden Administration is proposing to allow applicants for student loan forgiveness to self-certify for this benefit.
I appreciate the gentlewoman coming forth, as she does represent the District of Columbia, but I think in the argument it is important to note that these are not just local judges that we are talking about. They don't handle any matter…
You are the head of this organization, and you have proposed taking to 11 parts per billion.





