I believe that the correct interpretation of this amendment and the intention of it would be, if a case went on to litigation and was not a part of the global settlement, it would not be covered by this agreement. But any settlements that were entered into now or subsequently that asked to be part of the global settlement by Congress would be appropriately covered.
Discussing the interpretation of an amendment related to global settlements.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
We think we have to make it work, and we think in Congress, we have got to work together to make that work.
It does not take a lot to have to sit here and listen and conjure up in your mind the undertaking that you are all involved in.
Congressman Sessions, when we get 10 people in a room, you get 10 different ideas.
That is why we respect the ability of local people to make local decisions and to come up with an answer.
Other voices in this conversation
