I believe that the correct interpretation of this amendment and the intention of it would be, if a case went on to litigation and was not a part of the global settlement, it would not be covered by this agreement. But any settlements that were entered into now or subsequently that asked to be part of the global settlement by Congress would be appropriately covered.
Discussing the interpretation of an amendment related to global settlements.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
You talk about fairness, you talk about cost-effectiveness, you talk about being pragmatic, you talk about science-based answers.
I thank the gentlewoman not only for taking the time to initiate this important discussion about our former colleague, the gentlewoman, Eddie Bernice Johnson, but also thank her for gathering together what I think is evidence of a solid…
the reason why we get specific about these items on both sides of the aisle is that we find that there is happy-talk conversation between us, and then something different appears
I rise to recognize Kathleen Spillane, chief of the Civil Works Branch for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District. In this role, Kathy oversees a comprehensive portfolio of critical water resources development…
Other voices in this conversation
