Pat Fallon: “I have heard a lot of claims, some of them very hyperbolic and some of which I would classify as drivel from some of the…”

“I have heard a lot of claims, some of them very hyperbolic and some of which I would classify as drivel from some of the prior speakers. It is one thing to disagree, but we should at least be truthful. Let's look at the amendment itself, section 716, lines 9 through 14: The Department of Defense may not use any funds for abortions except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or in a case where the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest. Let's be truthful, Mr. Speaker. At least we are making some progress. Some of the Members, our friends across the aisle, have actually used the term ``woman'' instead of ``birthing person.'' That is something that has, I think at least for me, given me some hope. The question before us is a simple one: Are we a rule of law nation or not? Secretary Austin's decision to pay servicemembers to pursue abortions is a clear violation of current law, the Hyde amendment. We are hearing ``necessary healthcare.'' Is it necessary healthcare, or is it an elective abortion? Necessary healthcare in the case of, let's say, rape is already covered under the Hyde amendment. Don't paint us with some wide brush to say that we want to take that right away. I would submit that many Republicans want to protect women that have been impregnated because of rape. That is absurd, and it really is very unfair. Is the DOD complying with Federal law right now or not? This policy does it by prohibiting funding.…”