If we only could do one constitutional amendment in the next 10 years, let's do this one. Think back. I wonder who those 35 Senators were in 1995 who all voted ``no'' on the balanced budget amendment, if any of them are still in Congress, if we could point to one of them and say, Had you voted ``yes'' in 1995, then surely during the surplus years we experienced in the late 1990s, it's easy to pass a balanced budget at that point in time because nobody's pig's getting stuck. We would have avoided trillions and trillions of dollars in debt had one Senator moved over in 1995. It would be interesting to see if any of those 35 who voted ``no'' are still in the Congress right now and would fess up to having a good slug of this problem. My colleagues all know that anybody can start a diet tomorrow. The easiest diet is the diet you start tomorrow. Wait until you start a diet today. The single greatest threat to our way of life is not al Qaeda. It is not the Islamist jihadists, as bad as they are. They will get some of us, but they will not get all of us.
Mike Conaway: “If we only could do one constitutional amendment in the next 10 years, let's do this one. Think back. I wonder who those…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance of a balanced budget amendment and reflects on past Senate votes.
Share
More from Mike Conaway
Let's have those kind of conversations as opposed to defending a loophole that allows some families in America to be treated differently.
We need to make sure that people that are unemployed, people that are having a tough time, have enough food to take care of their kids.
I thank my colleague from Texas for yielding and for those very kind words. I thank Chairman Engel and Mr. McCaul, the ranking member, for bringing this resolution forward. I rise today in strong support of the passage of my resolution…
Given the effectiveness of the Food for Peace Program, I believe, and the support from stakeholders, it is clear and important that we maintain that bipartisan effort.





