I thank the gentleman from Washington State for giving me the opportunity to testify today regarding the rule governing debate on H.R. 2393, the Country of Origin Labeling Amendments Act of 2015. Country of origin labeling, or COOL for short, was first enacted for meat products as part of the 2002 farm bill. Implementation of the law was delayed until 2008. Less than 5 months after the COOL implementing rule was published, Canada and Mexico challenged the rule at the WTO, arguing that it had a trade-distorting impact by reducing the value and number of cattle and hogs shipped to the United States. The process has since progressed through the dispute settlement panel phase and a U.S. appeal to the WTO's Appellate Body. In both instances, the WTO found that the way the regulations were implemented violated WTO obligations by discriminating against imported livestock. The United States was given until May 13, 2013, to bring its COOL regulations into compliance. In response, USDA issued a revised COOL rule in May of 2013 which required that production steps--born, raised, and slaughtered by origin country--be included on meat labels. The revised rule also prohibited the commingling of meat from imported and domestic livestock. At the request of Canada and Mexico, the WTO established a compliance panel to determine if the revised rule brought the United States into compliance with the previous ruling.…
Share
More from Mike Conaway
I have had the privilege and honor of serving most of my career in Congress on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It is important work that goes on in secret, typically, and it is really important. Typically it involves the…
I claim time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Simpson). The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 minutes.
The scope of this problem is really not appreciated unless you go to our borders and see what happens. All the things that come into this country, that are shipped into this country, generally come in on wooden pallets, and those wooden…
I was not present for this vote as I was at the White House for the signing of the 2018 Farm Bill. Had I been present, I would have voted ``YEA'' on rollcall No. 467.





