It is a matter of equity, because States that have income taxes, those income taxes that you pay in the State reduce your for Federal tax purposes. So you get to deduct those State income taxes. States without an income tax, unless we put this provision back in, those taxpayers in effect subsidize the rest of the United States' taxpayers because there are inequitable circumstances. So being able to deduct sales taxes means that the taxpayers in Texas are on a more equal footing with taxpayers in States that have an income tax. You mentioned the marriage penalty being a detriment to getting married. I don't know if that is the case. I do know there is a calculable tax toll for making the decision to get married. That may not dissuade couples from getting married, but it might. There is a tax toll, and all of us agree that strong families are the core of the institution that is America. And to the extent we discourage strong families, shame on us.
Mike Conaway: “It is a matter of equity, because States that have income taxes, those income taxes that you pay in the State reduce…”
On the recordJanuary 29, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of sales tax deductions and marriage penalties during a debate.
Share
More from Mike Conaway
Jun 19, 2019
It is not a matter of taking the benefits away from folks who meet the requirements; it is making sure that those scarce resources go to the ones who need it the most.
Sep 18, 2019
I share Chairman Peterson's concerns over hemp. I am worried we have opened Pandora's box.
Jul 10, 2019
Broadband access is not about convenience. It is about being able to participate in modern life and the economy.
Dec 2, 2020
I have no further speakers, and I yield myself the remainder of my time. Mr. Speaker, before I close, I would like to make a couple of comments about my colleague from Minnesota. Collin Peterson has served this House and the constituents…





