Although I remain highly skeptical of the science underlying this debate and dispute the fundamental need for this legislation, today's hearing is not about computer modeling and variables or formulas and graphs; it is about the very real costs that this bill will impose on our families, our businesses, and ultimately, our economy.
Mike Conaway: “Although I remain highly skeptical of the science underlying this debate and dispute the fundamental need for this…”
On the recordJune 10, 2009
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Conaway expresses skepticism about the science of climate change and the economic impact of the legislation.
Share
More from Mike Conaway
Dec 9, 2019
Given the effectiveness of the Food for Peace Program, I believe, and the support from stakeholders, it is clear and important that we maintain that bipartisan effort.
Jul 20, 2020
Thank you for your leadership on behalf of America's farmers and ranchers, especially in such trying times.
Jul 20, 2020
The Farmers to Families Food Box Program (FFFBP) was the victim of a rushed process that included no engagement with current distributors and nonprofits and resulted in cherry-picked contractors who were not qualified.
Jul 20, 2020
I am all for that, but just to have an open-ended check I don't think is necessarily a good idea.





