Although I remain highly skeptical of the science underlying this debate and dispute the fundamental need for this legislation, today's hearing is not about computer modeling and variables or formulas and graphs; it is about the very real costs that this bill will impose on our families, our businesses, and ultimately, our economy.
Conaway expresses skepticism about the science of climate change and the economic impact of the legislation.
Share
More from Mike Conaway
Let's have those kind of conversations as opposed to defending a loophole that allows some families in America to be treated differently.
Given the effectiveness of the Food for Peace Program, I believe, and the support from stakeholders, it is clear and important that we maintain that bipartisan effort.
I appreciate my colleague from Texas for yielding. I am certainly glad this day has finally arrived and to stand with American farmers by passing the USMCA. For the last year, Democrats obsessed over a partisan impeachment process while…
Other voices in this conversation
