Political Quotes

On the recordJune 23, 2014
Throughout the debate on this bill--in committee, in subcommittee--we have made the point over and over that this is simply a prospective change to the rules for the Commission. It has absolutely nothing to do with the rules that are already in place. The 60-some odd rules that are in place to protect under Dodd-Frank are unaffected by this change to the CFTC's rules and cost-benefit analysis. In the future, if Congress decides on a massive law change, as they did with Dodd-Frank--one side of the House decided that--and the CFTC has to go through this, at that point in time these rules come into effect. But title VII to Dodd-Frank and all the changes that were made at the CFTC are in place. So this is not going backwards. It is not looking backwards. This is simply a prospective change to the way the CFTC should operate going forward. They should have been operating under this rule anyway, but they weren't. The rules were antiquated. There were not enough teeth in them. So Chairman Gensler and others took advantage of it. This will close that loophole and future chairmen will have to abide by a rational cost-benefit analysis program that will improve the regulations. With that, Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Wisconsin (Ms. Moore). The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Said by
Mike Conaway
Texas

Share

More from Mike Conaway

Dec 20, 2018

I was not present for this vote as I was at the White House for the signing of the 2018 Farm Bill. Had I been present, I would have voted ``YEA'' on rollcall No. 467.

govinfo.gov
May 18, 2018

I thank the gentlewoman for letting me speak on her amendment. Mr. Chair, I have the great pleasure and honor of representing a community called Notrees, Texas, and so to be standing up in support of a forestry amendment might be a little…

govinfo.gov
Apr 2, 2019

If that is the case, I would ask the Speaker and the majority leader to immediately bring that bill to the floor to allow us all to stand up for the sanctity of life. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman has not been recognized for…

govinfo.gov
Dec 18, 2019

Other than authorizing an act of war, impeachment is the gravest item that we as a Congress can consider. The decision to move forward with impeachment of a United States President is so consequential that it has only been done three times…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation