I will be supportive of the Eshoo amendment if it is offered as a stand-alone amendment, but I do oppose it being offered as a secondary amendment. I do ask for a consideration of my amendment as a clean amendment. It is stronger. It is more expansive because obviously it addresses the mobile sources, as well as the static sources, that may be a source of emissions. While Mr. Cardoza is correct in the issuance of a study, this is a research and development bill; and as such, it is appropriate to study the effects of the emissions of biodiesel and add that concept to the substance of the underlying bill.
Michael Burgess: “I will be supportive of the Eshoo amendment if it is offered as a stand-alone amendment, but I do oppose it being…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to a research and development bill on emissions.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
I will simply underscore the fact that entry- level chemists at the EPA are hired at much higher than the GSA rate. These are not highly sought-after scientists. These are entry-level applicants, and there is no shortage of applicants for…
This has all been so moving and so lovely, but if anyone tuned in late tonight in C-SPAN, they probably thought I passed because it really did sound like a eulogy. I am still here, and I will continue to text and call and inform everyone…
I led a letter to the FDA asking them to reclassify naloxone to where you could get it without a prescription.
I am pleased to yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Alford) for his comments.





