On the recordFebruary 11, 2020
Not only does the bill raise questions about the Democrats' concern for women's health and safety, it also raises questions about the regard for the United States Constitution.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Burgess questions the constitutional implications of the bill regarding women's health.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
Sep 24, 2024
For the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume. During consideration of this resolution, all time yielded is for…
Sep 18, 2024
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, the reason we are here is because the average family of four is paying over $17,000 more per year thanks to the policies of the Biden-Harris administration and their allies in Congress. In…
Jul 9, 2024
May I inquire as to how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Texas has 12\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Dec 4, 2024
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. One of the bills that is being brought before us, H.R. 7198, is a Republican partisan bill, but it violates their own CutGo budgetary…
Other voices in this conversation
