The EPA's proposal to further reduce the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone represents one of the most costly regulations the agency has ever attempted to impose on the U.S. economy.
Editor's note · Context
Burgess criticizes the EPA's ozone regulation as costly and burdensome.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 1568 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 1568 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order…
I thank my friend from New York for yielding, and I thank him for leading this discussion on behalf of the Rules Committee today. I wanted to come down and speak in support of the rule, and I want to speak in support of the underlying…
I thank the gentleman from Georgia for yielding. I rise today to speak in support of the rule and the underlying bills: H.R. 8771, the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act; H.R. 8752, the…
This has all been so moving and so lovely, but if anyone tuned in late tonight in C-SPAN, they probably thought I passed because it really did sound like a eulogy. I am still here, and I will continue to text and call and inform everyone…





