the Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to further reduce the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone represents perhaps one of the most costly regulations the agency has ever imposed upon the United States' economy.
Burgess criticizes the EPA's ozone regulation as overly costly and burdensome.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
I thank the gentleman from Georgia for yielding. I rise today to speak in support of the rule and the underlying bills: H.R. 8771, the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act; H.R. 8752, the…
By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 1616 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 1616 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order…
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I do rise today in support of S. 2228, the Building Chips in America Act. Last week, Members of the Texas delegation sent a letter to our leadership requesting that we prioritize this…
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, may I inquire as to how many speakers the gentleman has remaining?
Other voices in this conversation
