The Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to further reduce the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone represents perhaps one of the most costly regulations the agency has ever imposed upon the United States' economy.
Michael Burgess: “The Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to further reduce the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone…”
Editor's note · Context
Burgess criticizes the EPA's ozone regulation as overly costly and burdensome.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
I never expected that CMMI was actually going to deliver the cost savings that was promised.
I led a letter to the FDA asking them to reclassify naloxone to where you could get it without a prescription.
I thank the gentleman for yielding additional time. However, one-sided pressure by the White House is not the way to ensure that end. Mr. Speaker, I urge passage of this rule from our committee, and I urge passage of the underlying…
I urge adoption of the amendment. It is important, with $31 trillion in national debt, that we be good stewards of taxpayer dollars. The gentleman is right. I have pursued this for a number of years, but it is because it is a noble cause…





