It is a lot cheaper than the $2.6 trillion that this thing is going to cost.
Michael Burgess: “It is a lot cheaper than the $2.6 trillion that this thing is going to cost.”
Editor's note · Context
Burgess argues that funding state programs is more cost-effective than the Affordable Care Act.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
It is now my great privilege and high honor to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Arrington), the chairman of the Budget Committee, as we debate the first bipartisan budget bill to pass the floor of the House I think in the…
This has all been so moving and so lovely, but if anyone tuned in late tonight in C-SPAN, they probably thought I passed because it really did sound like a eulogy. I am still here, and I will continue to text and call and inform everyone…
This is a national emergency. This is something we have got to address and save Americans, 200 every day.
I never expected that CMMI was actually going to deliver the cost savings that was promised.





