I thank the chairman. And I would address to the chairman: the gentleman who previously spoke must understand that this legislation was litigated in front of the American people for the last 2 years. They rendered their verdict, and the jury verdict in November was, ``We reject what you have done. We want something better.'' That's what this process is about today.
Burgess discusses public sentiment regarding recent legislation and the need for improvement.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
It is now my great privilege and high honor to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Arrington), the chairman of the Budget Committee, as we debate the first bipartisan budget bill to pass the floor of the House I think in the…
I will simply underscore the fact that entry- level chemists at the EPA are hired at much higher than the GSA rate. These are not highly sought-after scientists. These are entry-level applicants, and there is no shortage of applicants for…
I am pleased to yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Alford) for his comments.
I never expected that CMMI was actually going to deliver the cost savings that was promised.
Other voices in this conversation
