Michael Burgess actually said...

"I am absolutely, adamantly opposed to the recreational use of marijuana."

"But if there is a confounding circumstance like a positive test for marijuana, a good defense attorney can make a case for, well, that could be remote, so it might not be active."

".08 does not conform to the legal definition of driving impaired, but .08 plus a positive qualitative test for a metabolite of marijuana..."

"bipartisanship is asking for my input, not just for my vote."