On the recordMay 18, 2021
I would just--you know, I would love to see the argument how this waiver would benefit--seemingly, to me, it benefits only Vladimir Putin.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Burgess questions the rationale behind waiving sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
Share & report
More from Michael Burgess
Jul 24, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the resolution (H. Res. 1367) establishing the Task Force on the Attempted Assassination of Donald J. Trump, as amended. The Clerk read the title of the resolution. The text of the…
Jul 24, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H. Res. 1367, the measure under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is…
Sep 24, 2024
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I move the previous question on the resolution. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on ordering the previous question on the resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker…
Sep 24, 2024
Madam Speaker, I yield myself 2 minutes. The rules brought forth today, two are closed, but in both instances, neither received an amendment in which to make in order. If there are no amendments, by definition, then it is a closed rule. I…
Other voices in this conversation
