That's my understanding from the reports that have been done by Heritage and other groups. But interestingly, if Massachusetts wants to enact a mandate, they are a State. And if their residents say, Okay, we are happy with you, Governor. We are happy with you, State legislator or State senator, for enacting this mandate and they reelect them to office, that's all well and good. But here we're talking about the 50 States and various territories, a mandate applied across the board. This has never been done in this country before because there's a document called the Constitution that says we shouldn't be doing this.
Michael Burgess: “That's my understanding from the reports that have been done by Heritage and other groups. But interestingly, if…”
Editor's note · Context
Burgess discusses state mandates and constitutional concerns regarding federal mandates.
Share
More from Michael Burgess
I am prepared for the gentleman to close. Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to close. Mr. Speaker, let us talk about priorities. My Republican colleagues have theirs all screwed up, and I am being really kind…
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, may I inquire as to how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts has 4 minutes remaining. Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, is the gentleman…
This is a national emergency. This is something we have got to address and save Americans, 200 every day.
I thank my friend from New York for yielding, and I thank him for leading this discussion on behalf of the Rules Committee today. I wanted to come down and speak in support of the rule, and I want to speak in support of the underlying…





