I do need to address the question, and it may have been rhetorical, how dare anyone imply that this area is not significant? I haven't heard anybody imply such a thing. It is truly significant. That is not the issue. The issue is priorities. We have been hearing for the last week how important it is for poor children to have health care insurance. There are so many priorities; yet there are thousands and thousands of wonderfully historic significant pieces of property. No one, I would hope, would dare say that this area was not significant. It is quite significant.
Louie Gohmert: “I do need to address the question, and it may have been rhetorical, how dare anyone imply that this area is not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the significance of historic properties and health care priorities for children.
Share
More from Louie Gohmert
This is the bill, 728 pages, that we got from the Senate this week. Has anybody read it? Come on. That is over a billion dollars average per page. That ain't gold; that is fool's gold. Look, more IRS agents, as Art Laffer said years ago…
Look, 4,155 pages, and that doesn't include the couple of thousand pages of explanation, definition, and all this other stuff. At least with ObamaCare, 2,500 pages, we had time to go through it. I did. I read it, highlighted, made notes…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Amendment No…
I would like the Record to reflect that after 5 years or so of cooking ribs on the gutter or balcony or whatever you want to call it of the Cannon Building, the Architect of the Capitol decreed I couldn't do that anymore and found a…





