I appreciate yielding to the gentlelady to come down and call me outrageous. But what is outrageous is this process, this process of taking something so important and rushing it in here without having the proper input and the proper information. The National Institute of Justice has got their biggest study program in its history ongoing, and we don't have the results, and yet my colleagues want to rush in and throw $330 million at a process that is unproven and untried. I just don't think that is the way to go. We have got honest people involved in the process, but the process itself here has not been honest. With that, I would reserve the balance of my time.
Louie Gohmert: “I appreciate yielding to the gentlelady to come down and call me outrageous. But what is outrageous is this process…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about rushing funding for a program without sufficient information during a House debate.
Share
More from Louie Gohmert
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Amendment No…
This is the bill, 728 pages, that we got from the Senate this week. Has anybody read it? Come on. That is over a billion dollars average per page. That ain't gold; that is fool's gold. Look, more IRS agents, as Art Laffer said years ago…
Back in high school when I was a senior at a pregame warm-up at Carthage, I had my hands under the center about to take a snap, throw a pass--the manager had my helmet--I am looking at the split end, and the manager yelled, Louie, and I…
I thank my friend from Florida for those words and comfort that they will hopefully bring. I think most Americans, especially those that knew anybody who fought for our country in Afghanistan, are aware of how poorly things went a year ago…





