I appreciate very much my friend from California, Dana Rohrabacher, making the point that he did. There is nothing either sinister, wrong, criminal, improper when someone is engaged in an election or when someone is not engaged in an election, if offered information that may be helpful, whatever the source. Unless it is a known criminal that is going to advise someone about some potential crime, there is normally nothing wrong with seeking or even getting that information. I doubt there is anybody on this House floor, when offered information from a source about an opponent in a campaign, didn't at least take some action to see if there was anything legitimate to it. So it is just amazing, when we know that there is certainly probable cause to believe crimes have been committed during the Obama administration, yet we got nothing in the way of support in investigating the probable cause of real legitimate crimes; not those for which there is no known criminal statute that would be applicable or that may have been violated, but simply, you know, there may be times when it is bad taste.…
Louie Gohmert: “I appreciate very much my friend from California, Dana Rohrabacher, making the point that he did. There is nothing…”
On the recordJuly 14, 2017
Share
More from Louie Gohmert
Dec 23, 2022
Look, 4,155 pages, and that doesn't include the couple of thousand pages of explanation, definition, and all this other stuff. At least with ObamaCare, 2,500 pages, we had time to go through it. I did. I read it, highlighted, made notes…
Nov 16, 2022
The government must take responsibility and fix the major issues that are facing Puerto Rico before we even begin any serious discussion here about statehood.
Jul 14, 2022
I thank my friend for having and hosting this time. During biblical times, we read about sacrifices of babies to Moloch and to Baal. How could that happen? How could you allow a child--a tiny baby--to suffer like that? It goes on. I know…





