My inquiry is this, Mr. Chairman. Can the Chair tell me how reducing one account by $57 million is not adequate to cover a $41,492,000 increase in another account? It is $15.5 million more we are reducing than the amount we are increasing. So my inquiry is, please, Mr. Chairman, explain how the increase of $41,492,000 is more than the $57 million reduction. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair based the ruling on the fact that the amendment increased budget outlays.
Share
More from Louie Gohmert
I would like the Record to reflect that after 5 years or so of cooking ribs on the gutter or balcony or whatever you want to call it of the Cannon Building, the Architect of the Capitol decreed I couldn't do that anymore and found a…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Amendment No…
Back in high school when I was a senior at a pregame warm-up at Carthage, I had my hands under the center about to take a snap, throw a pass--the manager had my helmet--I am looking at the split end, and the manager yelled, Louie, and I…
How much time is remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Texas has 28 minutes remaining.
Other voices in this conversation
