On the recordJuly 1, 1999
this is, overall, a pretty good bill. It starts to bring statutory law up to pace with where the marketplace is. The markets, the financial markets in the United States, are the strongest in the world, but the laws governing them are greatly outdated. As a result of financial disintermediation in the markets, we now see different industries, banking and securities, securities and insurance, banking and insurance. It is time to catch up with that. This bill goes a long way in getting there. It does not create the perfect holding company model, the perfect financial holding company model, but it goes a long way to get there. I am very much appreciative that we have included the operating subsidiary language, allowing banks to decide what model they want to have, whether a national bank or a holding company. I think this is very safe and sound. In fact, one of my previous colleagues mentioned that the chairman of the Federal Reserve even said that there was no safety and soundness issue; at least 2 years ago he said that. Then he entered into a turf battle and changed his position, but he has been known to change his position before. I think this is overall a good bill. There are a couple of problems with it. Unfortunately, I think we are going backwards in putting restrictions on unitary thrifts. We are bringing the Federal Reserve into regulation of unitary thrifts where they have never been before.
Source
govinfo.gov




