if I could, I would like to engage the chairman of the subcommittee in a colloquy with respect to sections 126 and 127 of the conference report. First, if I might, in understanding, does the 2-year residency requirement mean that once residency is met the debtor enjoys the benefit of the State's homestead law for so long as he or she is a resident of that State even if they move from one homestead to another within that State? And, furthermore, does this same residency apply to military personnel and expatriates who maintain their residency within that State but may well be domiciled in another State or another country?
Lloyd Bentsen: “if I could, I would like to engage the chairman of the subcommittee in a colloquy with respect to sections 126 and 127…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing residency requirements in relation to homestead laws during a subcommittee colloquy.
Share
More from Lloyd Bentsen
I have nothing but the highest respect for the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Norwood). The problem is, the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Norwood) went as far as could go, and he ran into the White House. It is ironic, after being here for 7…
What we are seeing is a situation that enables banks to shop for the most lenient Federal regulator.
I was one of 21 Democrats who voted for the TPA bill. I think it is a good bill. I want to see the President get Trade Promotion Authority; I voted for it for President Clinton and I will vote for it for President Bush, if it is done the…
like all the Members here and like all Americans, I was shocked and quite frankly stunned at the actions that occurred yesterday. As we look at the news and the video of the actions over and over again, it is just unbelievable that America…





