I hate to have to oppose an amendment by my good friend, the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Roemer], but the fact is that we have invested about $18 billion in a program which from my viewpoint appears to work. It would be one thing if we were investing funds year in and year out and showing no results to walk away from the program, but that is not what is going on here. We are looking at a program where we are building up, where it is going to work, and it would be a grave mistake and really a bad business decision for us to walk away at this point, to break the contracts, to say that we are not going to go forward. And if we do not do it with this, as the gentleman from California [Mr. Brown] says, if we do not build the station, we will stop at this point and we will lose ground. I think it would be a very serious mistake. Yes, we have spent the vast majority of the money, and we made progress. Yes, two-thirds of the hardware has been developed.
Lloyd Bentsen: “I hate to have to oppose an amendment by my good friend, the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Roemer], but the fact is that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of continuing investment in a space exploration program.
Share
More from Lloyd Bentsen
The essence of this amendment is that the State of California is trying to secede from the Clean Air Act. I do not know if that is the intent, but that is what will happen if we allow that. I think that is grossly unfair. Mr. Chairman, in…
I was one of 21 Democrats who voted for the TPA bill. I think it is a good bill. I want to see the President get Trade Promotion Authority; I voted for it for President Clinton and I will vote for it for President Bush, if it is done the…
this bill has two problems. The first problem is that the majority has written a brand-new stimulus bill costing at least $150 billion over 10 years and brought it to the floor on the day that we are recessing for the President's Day…





