But they are going to have projections that they are going to get for, say, fiscal year 2001 and then they are going to pass the capital gains tax cut. I do not think they want to pass the capital gains tax cut and do it on an annual basis. I think they want to do it on a long-term basis, and I think it is going to be a problem in how it works. The point is that they would not want to have to come back and say, well, we set the cap gains rate at 20 percent this year, but because we got new CBO forecast, in order not to have to cut Medicare, we are going to go back and reset it at 21 percent. For the investor who is holding an instrument for 6 months or a longer period of time, that is going to be quite disruptive. And that is a problem in trying to do this. They either have to try to go all the way or no way.
Lloyd Bentsen: “But they are going to have projections that they are going to get for, say, fiscal year 2001 and then they are going to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of capital gains tax cuts during a budget debate.
Share
More from Lloyd Bentsen
What we are seeing is a situation that enables banks to shop for the most lenient Federal regulator.
let me start out by congratulating the committee for putting together this legislation and putting together the conference report. This is a very good bill. I think it says a lot about the Congress that it has been able to respond as…
First of all, I think the point the chairman makes and the author of the amendment makes is this should not be handled in an appropriations bill. The Committee on Financial Services ought to be looking at this. If FHA wants to raise the…
What is so different about preparing a regulatory budget from preparing a fiscal budget?





