Mr. Speaker, after the highway bill that busts the budget and all the pork projects in it, and the fact that we debated the Republican budget resolution at 12:30 in the morning because they did not want to debate it in the light of day, I did not think the fiasco of the House Republican leadership could be topped until this "special order" piece of legislation was brought to the floor. Mr. Speaker, this is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen. We are going to throw out the Tax Code, tell American business that they are not going to know how to invest, not going to know what to issue debt to, issue stock, not going to be able to know what to do because maybe we will do a new Tax Code by 2002. The gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Bunning) says that the bill says, "Congress should." There is a difference between "should" and "shall." The fact is that if we want to do tax reform, we should get the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Archer), the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means, my good friend and colleague from Texas, to mark up a bill and bring it to the floor. Let us debate it now. Bring the American people in on the deal. All this does is set up the Congress for failure and set up American business for failure.
Lloyd Bentsen: “Mr. Speaker, after the highway bill that busts the budget and all the pork projects in it, and the fact that we debated…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing a proposed tax reform legislation during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Lloyd Bentsen
I was one of 21 Democrats who voted for the TPA bill. I think it is a good bill. I want to see the President get Trade Promotion Authority; I voted for it for President Clinton and I will vote for it for President Bush, if it is done the…
Last year when we began putting together the budget for fiscal year 2002 and really putting together the Republican economic program for the next 10 years, we were told that the unified budget surplus would be $5.6 trillion over the next…
If we fail to fix [the system] now, the next financial crisis we face will again reveal its flaws.
I had not intended to support the substitute because we wrote a very good bill in the House. Again, I want to commend the chairman and the chairman of the subcommittee as well for the work they did. We worked very hard all day long to put…





