It is significant because yesterday, Democrats were told and, in fact, a number of Republicans as it turned out, were told that we could not offer a broad-based, voluntary, universal prescription drug program under Medicare because the fiscal year 2001 budget resolution did not provide for it. But today, barely 24 hours later, as I and others predicted, the Republican leadership has decided that the paper that the budget resolution is written on is not worth very much. So, we have before us a rule that shows the true hypocrisy of the Republican leadership when it comes to the question of providing true prescription, affordable prescription drug coverage for America's senior citizens.
Lloyd Bentsen: “It is significant because yesterday, Democrats were told and, in fact, a number of Republicans as it turned out, were…”
On the recordJune 29, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a rule related to a prescription drug program under Medicare.
Share
More from Lloyd Bentsen
May 18, 2015
What is so different about preparing a regulatory budget from preparing a fiscal budget?
Feb 13, 2002
I am not sure why we are debating this amendment in the first place; but the fact that we are, I think there is one flawed argument that has been made. If one cannot use the money for hard purposes in the first place, I do not think one…
Nov 29, 2001
Regrettably I rise today in opposition to H.R. 3210, the Terrorism Risk Protection Act. I am very concerned about tort provisions that were added to the bill by the House Rules Committee. As an original cosponsor of H.R. 3210, I am…





