I am not sure why we are debating this amendment in the first place; but the fact that we are, I think there is one flawed argument that has been made. If one cannot use the money for hard purposes in the first place, I do not think one can pledge it as a collateral for hard purposes because if they had a default, the money would be illegal at that point. I think the argument that was made was wrong in the first place, but I think it is sort of a meaningless amendment as it is.
Lloyd Bentsen: “I am not sure why we are debating this amendment in the first place; but the fact that we are, I think there is one…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating an amendment related to the use of funds during a congressional session.
Share
More from Lloyd Bentsen
I was one of 21 Democrats who voted for the TPA bill. I think it is a good bill. I want to see the President get Trade Promotion Authority; I voted for it for President Clinton and I will vote for it for President Bush, if it is done the…
Mr. Speaker, last night in his address to the United States on the administration's policy towards Iraq, the President laid out his indictment of the Iraqi regime and particularly its leader, Saddam Hussein. In doing so, he answered a…
I think that the bill before us today is actually a pretty good bill. I voted for the fast track bill that President Clinton sent up, and I think this bill is better than the bill that President Clinton sent up. I also think that this bill…
for far too many Americans, this economic stimulus package is a ``day late and a dollar short.'' For months, my constituents have shared their concerns about the state of our economy. They knew we were in a recession even before September…





