One of the concerns we have heard throughout a lot of the discussion is the fact that there are payments being made for doing nothing. There are no marketing loan payments being made for doing nothing. A farmer has to produce. The cotton has to be produced, the cotton has got to move into the marketplace, and as the gentleman from Massachusetts said in his statement, there has been no cost for the program. The program is working.
Larry Combest: “One of the concerns we have heard throughout a lot of the discussion is the fact that there are payments being made for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness of agricultural payment programs during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Larry Combest
We certainly do not want to repeat that crisis which impacted the economies of even the largest U.S. cities.
Thanks to crop insurance, the American farmer and rancher is much better positioned to meet the challenges ahead in feeding, clothing, and fueling the country and a great many around the world.
I think, however, it is much more identifiable which dogs potentially are going to be used for fighting purposes than there are for game birds.
Mr. Chairman, just to make the record clear, subsection B of the amendment would have provided an opportunity for a point of order by the Committee on Appropriations. The gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews) has worked this issue out…





