once again we have come to a point where Congress is faced with the decision of how we will manage the Nation's pocketbook. It is important to remember that this is not our pocketbook, it is the people's and we are responsible to them. We are faced with two choices. We can sign on again to the status quo, to last year's bad deal that increased taxes and still has the deficit going up in the very near future. That is the Clinton budget. Last year it amounted to a step backwards, this year it amounts to standing still. The Clinton budget is as notable for what it does not contain as for the increased spending and taxes that it does. Look as hard as you want and you won't find the administration's number one priority--health care reform--anywhere in here. According to the White House, it is supposed to save money; according to the Congressional Budget Office it will increase spending, but according to the President's budget it will do nothing at all--because it's not in here at all. Some have said health care is MIA in the President's budget. In fact it is AWOL--absent without leave--because a budget is the place for things that affect Federal spending. It is a place for priorities. Health care is merely the most expensive item the President talks about that is not in his budget, but it's not alone. The President's budget literally does not do what he says. The President has not put his money where his mouth is or his priorities where his promises are.
Lamar Smith: “once again we have come to a point where Congress is faced with the decision of how we will manage the Nation's…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing the Clinton budget and its lack of focus on health care reform.
Share
More from Lamar Smith
I thank the gentleman from California for his comments and also for his initiatives on the subject of energy in so many ways. Several other bills that we are considering are a result of that initiative. Mr. Speaker, I have no other…
While research on carbon capture, storage, and sequestration technologies remains a priority, there is also potential to research ways to use carbon as an energy resource.
I thank the gentleman from Oklahoma, the vice chairman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology (Mr. Lucas), for yielding me time on his bill. The energy bill we are considering is H.R. 5906, the ARPA-E Act of 2018. It…
I thank the vice chairman of the Space Subcommittee for yielding me time, and I appreciate all that Mr. Brooks, the gentleman from Alabama, has done for space exploration and for spaceflight. The House Science, Space, and Technology…





