On the recordJuly 8, 2015
The EPA must consider the costs of its decisions and weigh those costs against any potential benefits.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Emphasis on the Supreme Court ruling regarding EPA's cost-benefit analysis.
Share & report
More from Lamar Smith
Dec 20, 2018
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on S. 7, the bill now under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to…
Sep 13, 2018
Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California for his comments and also for his initiatives on the subject of energy in so many ways. Several other bills that we are considering are a result of that initiative. Mr. Speaker, I have no…
Nov 27, 2018
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material on H.R. 4254, the bill now under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection…
Sep 13, 2018
Mr. Speaker, I have further speakers, but I will yield to the ranking member if she has any speakers. I reserve the balance of my time.
Other voices in this conversation
