The President's pledge attempts to create an international agreement that binds the United States for decades to come, but lacks constitutional legitimacy since it has not been ratified by the Senate.
Editor's note · Context
Smith argues the U.S. climate agreement is unconstitutional and financially burdensome.
Share & report
More from Lamar Smith
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 6227, the bill now under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and concur in the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 6227) to provide for a coordinated Federal program to accelerate quantum research and development for the economic and national security of the…
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Rohrabacher), who has been a longtime and active member of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, and also the former vice chairman of the committee.
Mr. Speaker, first of all, I want to thank the gentleman from California, my friend and colleague, for yielding me time. Mr. Speaker, I support S. 1768, the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2018. The…





