This legislation represents an irresponsible overreach and does not contain the necessary protections to safeguard taxpayer dollars from abuse, waste, and fraud. Ken Feinberg, the special master of the original 9/11 fund, has stated that if the fund is reenacted, it should be for a window of 5 years, not 21, and that it should be done with ``the understanding that there would be no changes in the rules and regulations governing the original fund, and that the new law would simply be a one-line reaffirmation of the original 9/11 fund.'' Unfortunately, the majority did not listen to Mr. Feinberg's sound advice. Instead, we are considering a bill that creates a fund with an unnecessary 21-year-long duration that contains special protections for trial attorneys, extends greatly the original fund's eligibility and criteria, and does not include the procedural protections necessary to safeguard the fund from abuse, waste, and fraud. I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this bill.
Lamar Smith: “This legislation represents an irresponsible overreach and does not contain the necessary protections to safeguard…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker criticizes a bill related to the 9/11 fund for its duration and lack of protections against misuse.
Share
More from Lamar Smith
As I said yesterday, when government contractors make mistakes, typically no one is held accountable.
When it comes to immigration policies, a recent poll shows that the American people are far closer to President Trump than to the liberal media. The results of a Harvard- Harris poll by Mark Penn, a former Hillary Clinton strategist, came…
I thank the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Roskam) for yielding me time, and I thank another gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Rodney Davis) for introducing this legislation. The Equitable Access to Care and Health Act is a bill that I strongly…
Energy produced from fossil fuel is abundant, affordable and vital to America's security and competitiveness.





