because in America when both spouses pay into Social Security, the formula, the way it works, is that if their husband passes away, which normally happens first, she keeps all of her Social Security. Then she keeps all of his minus hers. That is the formula. For those in government pensions, like teachers, it is almost the exact same formula. They keep their retirement plus their husband's minus only /3. So I appreciate this is an issue dear to the gentleman from Texas's (Mr. Lampson) heart, but under the formula today, that teacher, that government worker already keeps more of their spouse's Social Security than the rest of America. And if we keep the loophole open, they gain nearly twice as much as the family that worked exactly the same hours, paid exactly the same money in, and whose husband died exactly at the same time. We are creating those two classes of families in America, and that is what we are trying to stop.
Kevin Brady: “because in America when both spouses pay into Social Security, the formula, the way it works, is that if their husband…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing disparities in Social Security benefits for spouses and government workers.
Share
More from Kevin Brady
I am really proud to yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Murphy).
On behalf of seniors who rely on generic drugs, I include in the Record the following letter from generic and biosimilar manufacturers, which explains the price controls in this Democrat bill will reduce competition from lower-cost generic…
Actually, never make that offer to a sitting Member of Congress. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. This has been awfully good work on behalf of the bipartisan Members of Congress on an issue they believe in. But…
I include in the Record this Penn Wharton School of Business analysis that debunks the Inflation Reduction Act, showing how this bill will reduce inflation by less than a tenth of 1 percent in the first 5 years, with zero impact on…





