we are told this bill is fully paid for and is fiscally responsible. But how many times have we seen this same tax break on the floor supposedly paying for another bill? Is it the second time, third time? I don't mind double-counting, but there is something offensive about triple-counting. I think that is what got Enron in trouble in the first place. Today we are using this as an excuse to raise taxes and cut jobs and cut energy production here. It is not fiscally responsible. And by the way, the tax on SUVs is not Hummers. It is above $15,300, and that is a lot of Explorers and a lot of small business vehicles.
Kevin Brady: “we are told this bill is fully paid for and is fiscally responsible. But how many times have we seen this same tax break…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over a tax bill's fiscal responsibility and its impact on jobs and energy production.
Share
More from Kevin Brady
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 424, nays 8, not voting 1, as…
I insert in the Record the following analysis which shows the top 10 manufacturing industries hit hardest by the Democrats' made-in-America manufacturing tax. These are predominantly minority communities and working-class Americans. TOP 10…
I am proud to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Rice), the Republican leader of the Oversight Subcommittee.
I would note that every Democrat in Congress, in the House and Senate, strongly opposed providing prescription drugs for seniors in Medicare part D, and then-Leader Pelosi at the time said, it would end Medicare as we know it to help…





