I would point out it is difficult to have an abusive program when there is 97 percent customer satisfaction and zero privacy violations and zero Fair Debt Collection Act violations. Zero. I point out as far as efficiency, you don't have to take anyone's word on this floor if this program is working. Attached to this bill is testimony that says eliminating it will cost the U.S. taxpayers $1 billion. So you don't have to take our word for it. The experts who are independent, who have looked at this issue, know this is an efficient program for the U.S. taxpayers.
Kevin Brady: “I would point out it is difficult to have an abusive program when there is 97 percent customer satisfaction and zero…”
Editor's note · Context
Defending a program's efficiency and customer satisfaction during a debate.
Share
More from Kevin Brady
I strongly support this great bipartisan work from the House. I thank Chairman Neal and the Ways and Means Democrats for working together with us and the Senate Finance Committee. I urge strong passage in the House. Mr. Speaker, I yield…
I include in the Record a letter from the Congressional Budget Office, which confirms this bill will actually increase the cost of new drugs. U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC, August 4, 2022. Re Additional…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 424, nays 8, not voting 1, as…
I include in the Record the following letter from dozens of Main Street businesses opposing the Democrats' bill because of the IRS' targeting of their business under the bill and tax hikes on small businesses. August 11, 2022. Hon. Nancy…





