I thank the gentleman for his amendment. The amendment proposes to add funding back to the JLTV program, cutting the House defense bill due to a lack of information provided by the Army budget justification. The cut to the JLTV program reflects the committee's concern with the Army's failure to provide the full budget justification information for an $804 million program. Failure to provide this information makes it impossible for the committee to exercise its fiscal oversight responsibilities. However, the JLTV program is important to the warfighter and is executing well. I do not oppose this amendment.
Kay Granger: “I thank the gentleman for his amendment. The amendment proposes to add funding back to the JLTV program, cutting the…”
Share
More from Kay Granger
I continue to reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Chair, I yield to the gentleman from Maine (Mr. Golden).
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 225, nays 201, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 4, as follows: [Roll No. 549] YEAS--225 Adams Aguilar…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from Connecticut will be postponed. Announcement by the Acting Chair The Acting CHAIR…
As I said before, the bills before us do not reflect the economic realities we face. At a time of record-high inflation, the Federal Government should be reducing not increasing spending. The priorities included in these bills are simply…





