This amendment increases funding for the Virginia-class submarine program by $1 billion, at the expense of other critical Navy and Air Force programs. The Department of Defense, Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, and the National Coast Guard Association of the United States all oppose this amendment. In fact, the Deputy Secretary of Defense sent a letter detailing the harmful effects this amendment has on multiple critical National Defense Strategy programs. His quote: ``disrupt multiple critical National Defense Strategy programs.'' These are must-have programs, like the DDG 51 guided-missile destroyer, the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, the Global Hawk, and the TAO fleet oiler, just to name a few. I have also received a letter from the National Guard Association opposing this amendment. Mr. Chairman, I include in the Record the letters I received from the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the National Guard Association. Deputy Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC, June 26, 2018. Hon. Kay Granger, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Washington. DC. Dear Madam Chairwoman: The Department of Defense (DoD) objects to the proposed amendment by Representatives Courtney and Wittman that cuts over $1 billion from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 President's Budget.…
Kay Granger: “This amendment increases funding for the Virginia-class submarine program by $1 billion, at the expense of other…”
Share
More from Kay Granger
Republicans are working on policies that will grow and strengthen our economy. We will also find ways to reduce spending without impacting our Nation's defense, our commitment to our veterans, or the services that Americans depend upon.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 225, nays 201, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 4, as follows: [Roll No. 549] YEAS--225 Adams Aguilar…
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Virginia (Ms. Spanberger).
The bill before us does not include and reflect the economic realities we face. I urge my colleagues to vote ``no,'' and I yield back the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, before I conclude, I thank and congratulate Chairman…





